No Entries
Posts: 8
New Zune
So much for that ta-da event tomorrow -- Microsoft just confirmed the fall Zune lineup a little earlier than planned, and it's almost exactly as leaked: capacity bumps to 120GB and 16GB, new WiFi music store, Zune 3.0 software with recommendations and pre-programmed theme channels, and two new games, Hexic and Texas Hold 'Em. Oh, and that snappy blue flash Zune we just spotted. Pricing is similarly unsurprising, seeing as we've had it for a week: the 120GB Zune is $250, while the 16GB flash model is $199 and the 8 gigger is $149. Oh well, at least we still have those new mice and webcams to look forward to tomorrow, right? Certainly nothing else is going on.
Citizen Survey
Both major U.S. parties made political history last week: The Democrats officially nominated an African-American for President, and the Republicans effectively chose a woman as a vice-presidential candidate. At a time when much of the convention coverage involves reporters covering reporters who are covering other reporters, let's look at how "citizen journalism" rose to the occasion ...
On Digg.com, the wisdom of crowds made the most popular story on Friday a "prickly" interview that Time conducted with Republican presidential nominee John McCain. The second most popular story - counting from noon on Friday - was an item about a hacker holding Soulja Boy's MySpace account for ransom. A bandwidth block by the Internet service provider Comcast came in third . News about Ron Paul, the candidate beloved by tech types who forget that the government created the Internet, came in fourth.
Over at ireport, CNN's citizen journalism project, the leading story was about how markets in Baton Rouge, La., are running out of supplies as people there stock up for hurricanes. It's a big story, but the first comment says it isn't true, so I don't know what to think. Many of the other top picks consist of on-the-scene reports, such as interviews with convention protesters, or opinion pieces about McCain's vice-presidential pick or Bill Clinton's philandering. Luckily, all this serious stuff wasn't popular enough to push out a story about "Cindy and Jen at American Idol Concert." The upshot: People asked this mother-and-daughter duo if they were sisters! The Times totally missed this!
Over at Wikinews, citizen volunteers did come up with one legitimate scoop: Obama and McCain staffers may be making dubious edits to their candidates' Wikipedia entries.
And who could have predicted that?
Robert Levine is the MOLI View contributing editor for Business and Technology.
Chnge U Can Blv N
4 scor & 7 yrs ago R fthrs brght 4th N this cont a new natn concvd N lib & ded 2 prop tht all men R =
Now we R Ngagd N G8 cvl wr test weth tht natn R Ny natn so cncvd & so ded cn lng Ndur. We R met @ gr8 bttlefld F tht wr. We come 2 ded prtn F tht fld as finl rest plce 4 those who gave thr lives tht natn liv
But N lrgr sense we cant ded, conscrte ths grnd. The brav men who stggled here conscrte it above R poor power to + or -. Wrld will not note or rmembr what we say here but it can nvr 4get what they did her. Rthr 4 us 2 B ded 2 gr8 task B4 us - that this natn ndr G-D have new birth frdom - N that gov F ppl by ppl &4 ppl shall not vnsh from RthRobert Levine is the MOLI View contributing editor for Business and Technology.
Comment Confusion
When I read the New York Times online, I almost never look at any of the features the paper has introduced in its efforts to move into the new media world. (Usual disclosure: I write for the Times, but I'm using it as an example because I rarely look at other papers online.) If I wanted audio or video, for example, I could easily get it from websites that are really good at creating audio and video. Some of the blogs are interesting, but I sometimes think that most of the news they run just didn't make the cut for the paper. And I don't think I've looked at comments more than twice.
Gawker explained why: Most comments are useless. I like the ability to leave and respond to comments on social networks like MOLI, where writing is just a part of a larger community. But when I read a newspaper like the Times, I want to get the last word on something. The idea that there can ever be a last word on something seems downright old-fashioned, but that's why people read the Times. Indeed, I'd say that's the entire point of the Times: To have the last word.
The Times doesn't create space for comments beneath most articles, although many believe it should. Where it does allow comments, in blogs and some articles, the results aren't exactly encouraging. Let's take Bits, the Times technology blog, which I read sometimes. In a highly unscientific survey on one afternoon, the vast majority of blog posts seemed to attract between one and 10 posts, most quite reasonable. But a post about Microsoft's online services refusing to accept user names that contained "Tibet" drew about 100 comments, only a fraction of which actually said anything. Most insulted Microsoft, some insulted the Chinese - both of whom may deserve it - and a few insulted the reporter. None of the comments were really bad, but none added anything to the original post.
A breaking news post about the death of comedian Bernie Mac drew more than 700 comments, all of which basically said it was a shame that he died so young since he's really very funny. I can't argue with those sentiments, but I'm not quite sure why anyone would say so on the Internet instead of to their friends or family members. Again, I can't argue with the sentiment - I'm just not quite sure what the point is.
I had similar feelings about a news post on the tragedy on mountain K2. Some comments simply expressed regret. Others wondered why any sane person would risk their lives trying to do something that seems rather pointless - which is a sensible, but not sensitive, thing to say after people die.
I don't think that any of these comments undercut Times journalism, but they didn't add to it, either. I can't picture many people actually reading all of these comments. I think they're just there so readers can vent. Until comments cohere into a conversation, though, there isn't any other value to them.
Robert Levine is the MOLI View contributing editor for Business and Technology.
Defining Journalism Down
In mid-July, NYU professor Jay Rosen asked a provocative question about citizen journalism: "Can we take the quote marks off now?" A longtime champion of what's called citizen journalism, Rosen believes that it's time to start giving user-generated content more credit: "Can we remove the 'so-called' from in front?"
Here's my response to Rosen: As soon as I see something worthy of the name. Also: I think reading websites all day is taking a toll on your grammar.
But Rosen would say I have old-media values. He's busy building a career out of promoting user-generated content as a competitor to the dreaded "MSM." He's even called professional journalists a tribe, implying that we operate as an interest group. I'm not sure I'd qualify as a member (but if we can operate casinos, I'm totally in!) but I admit that I'm concerned that a group of people willing to do my job for nothing could endanger my ability to make a living. Rosen doesn't have to worry about this, of course, because he's a member of another tribe: tenured academics.
To make sure I'm not being unfair, I took a look at CNN's iReport site, to which users upload content that they would describe as journalism. Here's what I found on August 10. (I wrote this before my tribe went on its mid-August migration to upstate New York.)
Under the heading "Fresh iReports," the latest story was a screed about China messing up the U.S. national anthem at the Olympics, illustrated with an image of the Marines raising the American flag at Iwo Jima. The central point: "PLAY OUR NATIONAL ANTHEM CORRECTLY, CHINA. Otherwise, WE are insulted." While I can't argue with the idea that a country able to coordinate such a spectacular opening ceremony should be able to do justice to "The Star Spangled Banner", this isn't journalism so much as commentary - the kind that's only entertaining in a sports bar.
When I looked under "Newsiest Now" - which the site says is "a calculation that combines freshness, popularity, activity, and ratings" - the most recently posted item was a group of photos of the conflict in Gori, Georgia. The images were affecting and emotionally disturbing in a way that brings home the horrors of war. But there's almost nothing in the way of context - time, location, identification - that would give the photos more news value.
Under "Highest Rated," the lead item is a photo of a house of mirrors - from the outside. The second item is a photo of a tourist feeding cute monkeys. Well, it's not news that we all love cute monkeys!
Under "Most Viewed," the lead item was "Sexism Abounds in Media Coverage of Edwards Affair." The writer argues that "the affair is an entirely private matter between him and his family, and I, the public, and the media have relatively little to do with it." Which doesn't make sense, since almost all major news organizations left the Edwards affair to the National Enquirer until the former candidate himself confessed.
On average, CNN's iReports make CNN look intellectual by comparison - which takes some doing. There may be some decent citizen journalism somewhere on the Internet - but, to answer Rosen's question, I'm going to keep qualifying the term for now.
Robert Levine is the MOLI View contributing editor for Business and Technology.